Introduction:

The subsea cable industry is entering a high-growth, high-complexity phase driven primarily by AI, hyperscale cloud expansion, and geopolitical risk. Technology roadmaps are shifting from incremental upgrades to large-scale architectural redesign. As AI workloads surge and hyperscale cloud deployments scale globally, the priority is shifting from basic connectivity to resilient, strategically differentiated network infrastructure. Beneath the oceans, the subsea fiber-optic systems that carry more than 95% of international data traffic are being reassessed, re-engineered, and re-regulated. As of 2024, there were reportedly more than 600 submarine cable systems (532 operational + 77 planned).

Capacity and Architecture Evolution:

• Throughput is accelerating from traditional 20–40 Tbps systems to 400 Tbps+ class designs, enabled by:

  • Space-division multiplexing (SDM) with higher fiber-pair counts

  • Advanced coherent optics and probabilistic constellation shaping

  • More efficient repeaters and lower-loss fibers

• Subsea cable systems are increasingly co-designed with hyperscalers for AI-training workloads that require extreme bandwidth and consistent low latency.

• Hyperscalers support global cloud services, AI/ML workloads, and massive data flows — requirements that only high-capacity, high-performance undersea cables can satisfy. By owning or co-owning cables, these companies reduce dependency on traditional telecom carriers, improve redundancy, and gain more control over routing, latency, and capacity planning.

• Historically telcos and specialized carriers laid and operated undersea cables. Now, cloud giants themselves are wrapping subsea infrastructure into their global network stacks.

• Here’s a summary of hyperscalers in the Subsea-Cable Market:

  Google

  • Google is among the most prolific investors: reportedly involved in about 33 subsea cables globally.

  • Recent and planned projects include the upcoming Humboldt Cable (linking Chile and Australia), intended to create a new South America ↔ Asia-Pacific route.

  • Google’s involvement typically aims to serve its cloud and data-center operations, improving capacity, latency, and resiliency across its global network.

  Meta (parent of Facebook / Instagram / WhatsApp)

  • Meta has significantly broadened its subsea footprint. According to recent reporting, it plans a major new global cable project — possibly its largest — which would mark the first time the company is the sole owner of a fully private, global-scale undersea cable. TechCrunch+2suboptic.org+2

  • This shift underscores the company’s drive to fully own its data transport infrastructure (rather than rely on traditional telco-owned cables), giving it greater control over capacity, latency, and where traffic moves. TechCrunch+1

  Amazon Web Services (AWS / Amazon)

  • AWS is also listed among the major hyperscalers investing in subsea cables globally. americangovernancetoday.com+1

  • This investment reflects the growing need for cloud providers to ensure high-bandwidth, low-latency, and resilient global connectivity to support cloud services and AI workloads. FlipHTML5+1

  Microsoft

  • Microsoft is likewise involved in the construction and ownership of subsea infrastructure. americangovernancetoday.com+2German Marshall Fund+2

  • Historically, it has co-owned systems — for example, with Meta — but as with other hyperscalers, the motivation is strategic: ensuring predictable capacity, performance, and data-center interconnectivity for cloud services.

Resilience-by-Design:

• The market is shifting from “best-effort” reliability to assumed-failure design, incorporating:

  • Diversified routing (avoiding choke points and geopolitically sensitive zones)

  • Deeper burial and armoring for seabed stability

  • Carrier-neutral landing stations that allow rapid rerouting

• Operators are integrating real-time monitoring, predictive maintenance, and autonomous fault detection into cable management platforms.

Integration with Cloud and Edge:

• New cables are being deployed with cloud data center adjacency as a primary requirement, not an afterthought.

• Growth in regional AI/ML clusters is prompting:

  • More mid-ocean branching units to improve localization

  • Distributed landing sites connected to edge compute locations

  • Greater dependence on software-defined interconnection and global WAN orchestration

Pressure Points – Capacity, Risk, and Regulation:

According to Mordor Intelligence, the global subsea-cable market is expected to grow from roughly USD 5 billion in 2025 to nearly USD 9 billion by 2030—evidence of rising demand for both throughput and redundancy. Operators and governments are navigating three major challenges:

1.  Geopolitical and security risk: Accidental cuts, anchor strikes, and deliberate interference are increasingly treated as systemic vulnerabilities.

2. Permitting, route diversity, and climate exposure: Coastal erosion, the need for protected landing zones, and more complex regulatory regimes are reshaping route planning and deployment timelines.

3. AI-driven bandwidth requirements: Next-generation systems must support orders-of-magnitude higher capacity with lower latency, optimized for AI-training and high-density cloud workloads.

These forces are shifting strategies from “What is the lowest-cost route?” to “What routes provide strategic resilience, scalability, and long-term value?”

Key Takeaways from the Modor Intelligence Report:

• By component, wet-plant equipment held 53.20% of the submarine optical fiber cable market share in 2024, and auxiliary and marine services are projected to advance at a 12.03% CAGR between 2025-2030.
• By cable type, single-mode fiber accounted for 67.89% of the submarine optical fiber cable market size in 2024, and SDM multi-core fiber is forecast to grow at a 13.89% CAGR through 2030.
• By client type, telecom operators still held a 62.00% market share in 2024 of the submarine optical fiber cable market size, while hyperscale cloud providers are outpacing them at a 12.98% CAGR through 2030.
• By capacity design, systems rated 16-60 Tbps held 56.00% market share in 2024, and above-60 Tbps links are advancing at a 13.70% CAGR through 2030.
• By geography, North America led with a 36.78% revenue share in 2024; the Asia Pacific is poised for the fastest expansion at an 11.56% CAGR through 2030.

Case Study: Mid-Atlantic Positioning:

Smaller jurisdictions are emerging as strategic nodes traditionally dominated by major cable hubs. Bermuda is one example: the island’s 2020 Submarine Communications Cable Act introduced one of the Atlantic region’s most transparent frameworks for landing-site permitting and protection zones.

With multiple new systems planned or announced, Bermuda demonstrates how geography combined with regulatory clarity can create a defensible strategic position. Rather than relying on promotional incentives, the jurisdiction offers disciplined permitting processes, alignment with investor timelines, and compatibility with broader route-diversification strategies.

Three trends will define the next phase of subsea-cable strategy:

1. Explosive throughput growth: Designs are moving toward 400-Tbps-class systems and high-fiber-pair architectures purpose-built for AI-training workloads.

2. Resilience and route diversity by default: Outages are assumed rather than hypothetical. Systems are being engineered with alternative paths, deeper burial, and more carrier-neutral landing facilities.

3. Regulation as part of core infrastructure strategy: Governments are treating subsea cables as strategic assets, increasing scrutiny on landing rights, environmental permitting, and data-sovereignty implications.

Security and Sovereignty Considerations:

• Governments are classifying subsea cables as strategic infrastructure, driving:

  • Tighter control over landing rights and ownership structures

  • Requirements for physical and logical segmentation

  • Increased surveillance for tampering, espionage, and sabotage

• Encryption and trust architectures are being embedded deeper into cable system design.

Deployment Speed and Regulatory Overhead:

• As climate risk, permitting complexity, and geopolitical scrutiny increase, deployments take longer and require more contingencies.

• Technology choices now depend partly on which routes can be approved, protected, and operationally supported long-term.

Implications for Site-Selectors, Executives, and Policymakers:

• For site-selectors and investors, landing-site decisions now hinge on risk exposure, operational flexibility, and regulatory transparency.
• For C-suite leaders, infrastructure alignment and ecosystem partnerships influence not only latency and cost, but also resilience, compliance readiness, and diversification.
• For policymakers, agile and predictable regulatory frameworks will determine whether a jurisdiction becomes a preferred landing point or is bypassed entirely.

Conclusions:

The subsea cable market is rapidly evolving into a hyperscale-driven, AI-optimized, resilience-centric segment of global infrastructure. Future systems will be defined not just by terabits per second, but also by architectural flexibility, geopolitical robustness, integration with cloud and AI ecosystems, and regulatory alignment.  In summary, the subsea-cable sector is becoming a foundational layer of the global digital economy—an economy increasingly shaped by AI, cloud expansion, and geopolitical complexity. Jurisdictions that anticipate these shifts and design for resilience and scalability will play disproportionate roles in the decade ahead. The question is no longer simply where cables land, but how the broader ecosystem supports the next wave of digital growth.

References:

https://www.thefastmode.com/expert-opinion/46323-the-future-arteries-of-the-internet-subsea-fiberoptic-cables-in-the-age-of-ai-environmental-resilience-and-geopolitics

https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/submarine-optical-fiber-cable-market

Google Cloud announces TalayLink subsea cable and new connectivity hubs in Thailand and Australia

FCC updates subsea cable regulations; repeals 98 “outdated” broadcast rules and regulations

India’s Data Transmission Capacity to Quadruple in 2025 via New Submarine Cables

TechCrunch: Meta to build $10 billion Subsea Cable to manage its global data traffic

Google’s Bosun subsea cable to link Darwin, Australia to Christmas Island in the Indian Ocean

HGC Global Communications, DE-CIX & Intelsat perspectives on damaged Red Sea internet cables

“SMART” undersea cable to connect New Caledonia and Vanuatu in the southwest Pacific Ocean

Telstra International partners with: Trans Pacific Networks to build Echo cable; Google and APTelecom for central Pacific Connect cables

NEC completes Patara-2 subsea cable system in Indonesia

SEACOM telecom services now on Equiano subsea cable surrounding Africa

Orange Deploys Infinera’s GX Series to Power AMITIE Subsea Cable

China seeks to control Asian subsea cable systems; SJC2 delayed, Apricot and Echo avoid South China Sea

Intentional or Accident: Russian fiber optic cable cut (1 of 3) by Chinese container ship under Baltic Sea

Bharti Airtel and Meta extend 2Africa Pearls subsea cable system to India

Google’s Equiano subsea cable lands in Namibia en route to Cape Town, South Africa

Altice Portugal MEO signs landing party agreement for Medusa subsea cable in Lisbon