SVIEF Panel: Capitalizing on the Upcoming IoT Tsunami + Arrow’s IoT Perspective

Introduction:

The sixth annual SVIEF event was held September 30th to October 1, 2016 in Santa Clara, CA.  The conference discussed many hot tech topics like artificial reality/virtual reality, cloud & big data, robotics, smart cars, drones.  We summarize the Internet of Things (IoT) panel in this post as it’s the most closely related to communications technologies (which were not discussed)

Moderator: P. K. Agarwal, Dean & CEO, Northeastern University-Silicon Valley

Panelists:

  • Prashant Tyagi, Sr. Director, IoT and Big Data Platforms, GE Digital
  • Nik Tehrani, Vice President of Business Development, DynoSense
  • Steve Yung, Chairman & CEO, V5 Systems Inc.

Panel Discussion:

Moderator PK Agarwal gave each panelist an opportunity to quickly describe their company’s involvement and stake in IoT:

  • Prashant Tyagi said that while GE was founded in 1892 and is 124 years old, GE Digital has been in existence for only four years.  It’s focused on the Industrial IoT (IIoT), especially Return on Investment (RoI).  If GE can achieve an improvement efficiency >= 1% in the industrial control systems it operates (e.g. turbines, power, aircraft) it would result in a $200B cost savings for the company.  That’s five times the potential profits of the consumer IoT market, according to Prashant.  However, IIoT systems must operate on an industrial scale (assumes high availability and reliability)
  • Nik Tehrani said DynoSense is pursuing medical monitoring/measurements and cloud based data analytics as part of the digital health revolution.  He outlined a five step process for DynoSense IoT systems: 1) sensor captures data; 2) data analyzed by cloud based compute servers; 3) results of analytics are resolved; 4) respond if something has gone wrong (anomaly detected); 5) repeat and re-use the system.  From their website, the company was founded on March 13, 2013 (so is only a little more than three years old).
  • Steve Yung said  V5 Systems provides a self powered outdoor IoT platform which includes sensors, wireless communications, power management, storage, edge computing and edge security.  V5 provides a multi-layer IoT stack to facilitate those functions.
  • Steve said the health care market was said to be huge and growing at 75% to 80% with people looking for real time information.  A shift from reactive to proactive health care is in process, according to Yung.  Aging population needs help with more assisted living, especially in Japan.  Chronic care accounts for 75% of US health care expenses. Corporate wellness programs lower abstenteeism and increase productivity. There’s more involvement from health insurance companies and contract research organizations (CROs).

GE comments:

  • PK noted the wide range of technologies needed to make IoT a reality:  sensors, electronics, power management & control, connectivity (local and remote communications capabilities), edge computing, security, data analytics, cloud computing & storage.  How those all work together and cohesively is a real challenge.
  • Prashant opined that use cases will be very important for IoT.  GE Digital has created a “Digital Twin” analytics model that was used to improve efficiency at wind farms.  Each digital wind farm begins life as a digital twin (play the game), a cloud-based computer model of a wind farm at a specific location. The model allows engineers to pick from as many as 20 different turbine configurations – from pole height, to rotor diameter and turbine output – for each pad at the wind farm and design its most efficient real-world doppelganger.
  • The many digital twin opportunities for GE start with its big machines — aircraft engines, locomotives and gas turbines. Using the digital twin approach, a GE service team will know not only when to bring an aircraft in for inspection but what parts to have on hand and how long the jet will be out of service.
  • Digital Twin Reference:   http://gelookahead.economist.com/digital-twin/

 

DynoSense Comments:

  • The company’s innovative products are patented, advanced, and cloud-based health scanning platforms with health metrics and analytic engines that can be integrated into communities of caregivers, trainers, pharmacists, doctors, and family members.
  • Nik maintains that character builds companies- more so than technology expertise.  He cited the following important traits for success:  committment, heart, passion, humility, humor, and  “never give up.”
  • Addendum:  On Oct 3, 2016, Plus3.com and DynoSense Corp. announced an exclusive U.S. market strategic partnership to create a new and compelling corporate wellness offering that blends Plus3’s best-in-class socially-driven well being platform with DynoSense’s innovative home health monitoring system, all bundled in easy-to-use web and mobile apps.

 

V5 Comments:

  • Key features of V5’s outdoor IoT system include power management and ability to train sensors to recognize offsets.
  • Global security is the #1 issue for IoT, according to Steve (this author agrees).
  • Multi-disciplined expertise (EE’s, ME’s, software engineers, computer scientists, algorithm developers, etc)  are all needed to make IoT a reality.

 


Arrow’s IoT Perspective:

At the October 4th ST Developers Conference in Santa Clara, CA, Arrow’s IoT Director Jeth Harbinson outlined the key benefits of IoT.  While they appear to be most relevant to IIoT, they may also apply to other IoT industry verticals:

  • Optimize asset utilization
  • Reduce operational cost
  • Improve worker productivity
  • Improve worker safety
  • Create new revenue streams
  • Improve survivability
  • Enhance the customer experience

 

Jeth then provided a four step process for IoT development: Design, operate, optimize, and restore.  The necessary IoT functional components are:  sensors, edge electronics, gateways, connectivity, data platforms, analytics and security.  He noted there were over 200 IoT platforms (many industry specific) from vendors like Amazon, HP Enterprise, IBM, and many others and admitted it was quite difficult to sort them out.

In addition to being a distributor of hardware and providing software solutions, Arrow has also gotten into the systems integratrion business by providing hardware/software sub-systems for different IoT solution providers.


IoT References by this author:

(August 2016 IEEE GCN- see pg 2)

Telecom Council 2016 SPIFFY Award Winners include Simless (Virtual SIM Card)

The Service Provider Innovation Forum (SPIF) of the Telecom Council of Silicon Valley awarded seven start-up communications companies for their innovation, execution, management and technology  at the Council’s annual SPIFFY Award ceremony, held during the 9th annual Telecom Council Carrier Connections (TC3) Summit on Wednesday evening Sept 29, 2016 in Mt View, CA.  There was also an award for the most supportive carrier which went to Telefonica.

SPIFFY nominees attended the ceremony, joined by 50 global fixed and wireless telecommunications operators and over 600 industry professionals.

SPIF members review startups at Telecom Council meetings (not open to the media) several times each month. Competition for these awards is intense, because all startups are screened before they are selected to present to the Telecom Council. All startups who present have already been identified as having ideas, relevance, and traction that most appeal to our carriers from around the globe.

35 nominees from 200 startups were announced in July 2016; and from TC3, here are the winners of the 2016 SPIFFY Awards:

  • The Graham Bell Award for Best Communication Solutions goes to ThinkCX Technologies
  • The Edison Award for Most Innovative Start-Up goes to Peel
  • The San Andreas Award for Most Disruptive Technology goes to Loop AI Labs
  • The Core Award for Best Fixed Telecom Opportunity goes to CUJO
  • The Zephyr Award for Best Mobile Opportunity goes to Simless
  • The Ground Breaker Award for Engineering Excellence goes to Atheer
  • The Prodigy Award for the Most Successful SPIF Alumni is iControl Networks
  • The Fred and Ginger Award for Most Supportive Carrier goes to Telefonica

“Congratulations to the 2016 SPIFFY winners for their forward thinking and impact on the communications industry this year,” said Telecom Council President, Liz Kerton.  “We also commend the operators for their ongoing commitment to working with startups to improve communications networks and services. We look forward to hearing about these partnership success stories at next year’s TC3 Summit, in Silicon Valley on November 1-2, 2017.”

Comment & Perspective:

Of the seven start-ups receiving SPIFFY awards, only Simless makes something that directly touches the network.  The other start-up companies make various types of software or apps that enhance the user experience or provide security like firewalls.   Of course, this is because VCs, corporations, angels, etc are not investing in network infrastructure start-ups, but in companies that provide various types of services and/or applications that use the network infrastructure.

Simless has developed a virtual SIM card for different cellular networks.  The company says they have built a secure and high-performance server platform that allows users to remotely create, distribute and manage digital SIM cards. The platform includes tools that enhance the discoverability of network operators’ offerings while providing more choice and better cellular connectivity experience to end-users.

Simless website “technology” section states: “We are actively developing reference devices, mobile OS patches and “SIM-less” System-on-Chip (S2oC) components to power the next generation of connected devices.”

IHS: Data Center Network Equipment Up 11% YoY; Software-Defined Enterprise WAN a $1.3 Billion Market by 2020

By Cliff Grossner, Ph.D., senior research director, data center, cloud and SDN, IHS Markit

Bottom Line

  • Data center network equipment global revenue—including data center Ethernet switches, application delivery controllers (ADCs), software-defined enterprise wide area network (SD-WAN) and WAN optimization appliances (WOAs)—totaled $3.1 billion in the second quarter of 2016 (Q2 2016), growing 11 percent from a year ago
  • The SD-WAN segment is forecast by IHS Markit to total $1.3 billion by 2020, pegging triple-digit growth above 90 percent per year through 2020
  • Over 12,000 25 gigabit Ethernet (GE) ports shipped in Q2 2016, and triple-digit growth rates are expected out to 2020

IHS-Markit Analysis

Growth continued in the data center network equipment market in Q2 2016, although we anticipate a slowdown to 2018 followed by an increase out to 2020 as a broader transition to SD-WAN begins to take hold and data center and Ethernet switch revenue surges due to the growing adoption of 100GE.

SD-WAN going gangbusters (IHS-Markit opinion)

SD-WAN is gaining ground with service providers and is anticipated to make up 71% of WAN optimization1 revenue in 2020. Borrowing the software-defined networking (SDN) concepts of abstraction for the data plane with centralized control, SD-WAN delivers improved application performance for a fraction of the cost of traditional Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) links, causing a significant shift in enterprise WAN architecture. SD-WAN control can be delivered by a cloud service provider (CSP) from an off-premises cloud, transforming the WAN optimization market in light of SDN.

Note 1.  Definition: WAN optimization, also known as WAN acceleration, is the category of technologies and techniques used to maximize the efficiency of data flow across a wide area network (WAN). In an enterprise WAN, the goal of optimization is to increase the speed of access to critical applications and information.

SD-WAN vendors, too, are gaining traction. North American service providers continue to enter the market, including CenturyLink, which is using Versa Networks’ solution, and Verizon, which is partnering with Viptela and Cisco.

We look for declines in the WAN optimization appliance segment to persist as the data center market transitions to SD-WAN.

Editors Note:  We believe a “software defined enterprise WAN” is an overlay network with an IP-MPLS VPN as the most common underlay network.  Currently, there are no standards and hence no cross network or interoperability of network vendor equipment and/or software.  Each network provider’s SD-WAN is unique to that provider and is often a single vendor solution due to the lack of interoperability standards.

FYI, here’s the ONUG white paper on SD-WANs.  It’s hardly a design spec!

Cliff Grossner wrote in an email:  “SD-WAN, as implemented by most of the vendors is not a replacement for MPLS. It is an overlay on top of MPLS or Broadband services. Essentially an “over the top” play. In the case of a SP offering SD-WAN, they are currently using vendor equipment such as Viptel, Versa, and VeloCloud to provide the service. Perhaps in the future with SDN/NVF vCPE use case this will change.

Many of the solutions SD-WAN solutions allow the use of many different and lower cost link types Broadband(Internet wireline and wireless) along with MPLS. This is the power for the solution allowing a cost reduction for the enterprise.”

The need for speed

1GE ports exhibited a 14% sequential decrease in Q2 2016, which is in line with the move to higher-speed ports, primarily due to increased virtual machine density on servers and improved server performance—especially now that Intel’s Grantley server silicon is shipping in volume. Grantley offers many more cores per CPU than previous generations and in aggregate will push much more data per second onto the network.

10GE, 40GE and 100GE port shipments all posted year-over-year growth in Q2, with 40GE and 100GE leading the way.

Data Center Report Synopsis
The quarterly IHS Markit data center network report provides market size, vendor market share, forecasts through 2020, analysis and trends for data center Ethernet switches, bare metal Ethernet switches, Ethernet switches sold in bundles, application delivery controllers, software-defined enterprise WAN and WAN optimization appliances.

For information about purchasing this report, contact the sales department at IHS Markit in the Americas at (844) 301-7334 or [email protected]; in Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) at +44 1344 328 300 or [email protected]; or Asia-Pacific (APAC) at +604 291 3600 or [email protected]

Google Expands Broadband Internet Access in India

This is an update of an earlier article on Google Managed WiFi network for India Railways:

Google today announced a collection of updates aimed at helping get ‘the next billion’ internet users in India and emerging markets online. One of the more subtle yet interesting components to that push is the launch of Google Station, a project to enable free public Wi-Fi hotspots, which is now open for new partners.

In India alone, Google estimates that 10,000 people go online for the first time each hour, while in Southeast Asia the figure is 3.8 million per month.

The company made a big push on the free Wi-Fi initiative, and today it revealed that it now covers 50 national stations, providing internet access to 3.5 million people each month. (That’s up from 1.5 million in June.) Google and RailTel are targeting 400 stations nationwide, and, in addition to that, it has now opened the program up to other public organizations.

Google Station is aimed at all manner of public businesses, from malls, to bus stops, city centers, and cafes. And not just those in India, too, Google said.

“We’re just getting started and are looking for a few strategic, forward-thinking partners to work with on this effort,” it added in a statement.

For all the excitement around how Google is disrupting U.S. internet access with Project Fi and Google Fiber, Google Station has the potential to take things even further by giving the hundreds of millions who lack decent quality internet access, a reliable connection to get online regularly for the first time. That is potentially life-changing for many.

No doubt the project is in its early days, but it has the potential to do an incredible amount of good — and hopefully without running into conflicts of interest, as the free internet project from Facebook did.

https://googleindia.blogspot.com/2016/09/google-for-india-making-our-products.html

IHS Markit: 90% of Mobile Operators Surveyed Have Deployed Small Cells

By Stéphane Téral, senior research director, mobile infrastructure and carrier economics, IHS Markit

Bottom Line

  • The vast majority of mobile operators participating in the IHS Markit small cells survey have already deployed small cells, mostly in outdoor metro areas and in homes as residential femtocells
  • Security is the number-one small cell product feature, rising from the bottom of respondents’ list five years ago
  • Nokia emerged as the top small cell manufacturer among operators surveyed; its acquisition of Alcatel-Lucent has raised the “new” Nokia’s profile in the small cell space

Our Analysis

For our fifth annual small cell strategies study, we asked mobile operators if they have deployed small cells or plan to deploy them. Ninety percent of our respondents—compared to eighty-six percent last year—have already deployed small cells, while the rest plan to do so by the end of 2017. This illustrates the continued importance of adding small cells into existing macrocellular networks to close up coverage gaps and increase capacity. The principal business drivers behind operators’ deployment of small cells are lower subscriber churn and increased revenue.

Survey respondents are mostly connecting small cells to the nearest base station (BTS), but the use of gateways is rising. The bulk of small cells are being deployed in the 1.5GHz to 2.2GHz spectrum, where 3G and Long Term Evolution (LTE) reside.

When it comes to small cell product features, security has consistently risen from the bottom of respondents’ list five years ago to the top-rated feature this year after placing second last year. This is attributable to the increasing frequency and severity of security breaches and network hacking. Generally speaking, a small cell is easier to hack than a macro site that is typically not easily accessible to the public—and this will continue despite their camouflage. However, innovation in small cell installation in public spaces has led to small cells being embedded into furniture in public places such as bus stops in Amsterdam and London.

The integration of Alcatel-Lucent has led to the new Nokia emerging as the top small cell manufacturer among those surveyed, followed by Ericsson, Huawei and SpiderCloud, which continues its ascension. Nokia has the largest installed base, Ericsson leads under evaluation, and in China a flurry of homegrown players are under evaluation as well.

Small Cell Survey Synopsis

For its 30-page small cells study, IHS Markit conducted in-depth interviews with mobile operators worldwide about their small cell buildout plans. The study helps manufacturers and operators better understand the use cases for small cells, the number and types of small cells needed, the frequency bands required, and best-suited architectures.

For information about purchasing this report, contact the sales department at IHS Markit in the Americas at (844) 301-7334 or [email protected]; in Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) at +44 1344 328 300 or [email protected]; or Asia-Pacific (APAC) at +604 291 3600 or [email protected]


Separately, Acute Market Reports announces that it has published a new study Small Cells and Femtocells Market, Shares, Strategies and Forecasts, Worldwide, 2013 to 2019. The 2013 study has 413 pages, 162 tables and figures. Worldwide markets are poised to achieve significant growth as small cell and femtocells and trucks permit users to implement automated driving.

http://www.pdfdevices.com/global-small-cells-and-femtocells-market-2019-industry-size-share-trend-growth-analysis-and-forecast-report-acute-market-reports/

AT&T’s CEO Talks Integrated Communications, 5G, CAPEX Dependency on "Regulator"

Executive Summary:

Randall Stephenson,  AT&T chairman and chief executive officer (CEO) said that the company made a committment to have a full integrated suite of assets available.  That includes mobile, video, business communications and others.

“2019-2020 5G can “intercept the current LTE network” if AT&T has enough spectrum.  “Our target architecture is a wireless network, which may be a viable substitute for fixed broadband (wireline),” he added.  Stephenson spoke at the Goldman Sachs 25th Annual Communacopia Conference on September 21st.

Stephenson said the FCC Chairman position has tremendous power and the uncertainty of who will replace current FCC Chair Tom Wheeler will impact capital spending (more details below).

AT&Ts CEO made a lot of other interesting comments during his Q&A with the Goldman moderator.  You can listen to an audio replay of the webcast here (Registration Required).  T-Mobile USA also presented at this conference.

Separately, AT&T announced  that the company’s third-quarter 2016 financial results will be released after the New York Stock Exchange closes on Tuesday, October 25, 2016. AT&T will host a conference call to discuss the results that same day. The company’s earnings release, Investor Briefing and related materials will be available at AT&T Investor Relations.

AT&T CAPEX Dependent on Policies of Next FCC Chairman:

“As you start to make capital investment decisions over the next three or four years, it’s hard to make those decisions until you know who is sitting in that chair, as Chairman of the FCC,” Stephenson said. “That will determine how these services and these investments are regulated in the foreseeable future.”

Stephenson said that a recent court decision to defer any issues related to net neutrality to the FCC illustrates how much power the FCC chairman has in deciding how the overall telecom industry is regulated.

“Why is that so important?  It’s important, because what we have just demonstrated is the individual who is Chairman of the FCC kind of has somewhat ultimate rule making authority under this kind of purview.”

Stephenson added that the regulatory environment has created an environment where AT&T’s board of directors has to consider capital spending plans based on the FCC regulator’s policies.

“I have never been in a situation where my board was more active in discussing capital allocation by virtue of who is the regulator,” Stephenson said. “The regulator is very determinative in terms of how my board thinks about capital investment and capital allocation.”

CenturyLink: Slow Movement to Software-Defined Wide-Area Networks (SD-WANs)

Customer transitions to software-defined wide-area network technology are taking longer than expected, according to CenturyLink, as networks are being upgraded on a piecemeal basis, not all at once.  This is no surprise to this author, who has pounded the table that SD-WANs would be deployed very slowly because existing networking infrastructure could not easily be replaced and lack of a complete set of standards inhibited multi vendor interoperability.

“What we didn’t understand is most customers are themselves multi-tenant,” CenturyLink’s Eric Nowak said during a SD-WAN panel organized by Light Reading.

When CenturyLink deployed its SD-WAN service at the beginning of the year, it had expectations on how customers would view the importance of cost savings, the role SD-WAN would play on customer networks and more. All those expectations were subverted by reality.   CenturyLink expected customers to be interested in getting cost savings from SD-WAN. In reality, customers weren’t so much looking to save money as get more for the same spending, Nowak said. SD-WAN can provide five to ten times the bandwidth as conventional WAN with the same security and application performance, for the same money, he said.

CenturyLink thought its customers would transition their entire networks to SD-WAN. In reality, the transition is taking time, with new locations going on the new network and traditional connections remaining in place, Nowak said.

Again, no surpise to us, as we totally rejected Prof. Guru Paraulker’s ONS assertions/ demands that classical SDN (as defined by Open Network Foundation) must start with a clean slate and deploy all new equipment (centralized SDN Controller for the Control plane, with L2/L3 data forwarding engines for the Data Plane).  Overlay networks (that overlay SDN on the existing network infrastructure) were excluded and referred to as “SDN washing” – along with all the network vendor proprietary schemes that claimed to be “SDN compatible.”

“What we didn’t understand is most customers are themselves multi-tenant,” Nowak said. They have franchises, divisions and their own customers, all of which need to be managed independently.

“We as a service provider have customers with their own end customers,” Nowak said. “We sell to customers that have their own end customers downstream.”  SD-WAN needs to be tuned to allow Skype for Business and other applications to work, and that ability — and need — to customize “may be one of the things that limits adoption,” Nowak added.

CenturyLink not only uses multi-tenant capabilities internally, but it also delivers those capabilities as a service to help customers manage their own customers.  CenturyLink learned a lot from its first 50 customers.  “Those are a lot of lessons in a short amount of time,” said Heavy Reading Senior Analyst Sterling Perrin, who moderated the panel.

Service providers need to “co-opt” SD-WAN into their own offerings, rather than simply reselling SD-WAN “off a catalog,” Andrew Coward, vice president of strategy at Brocade Communications Systems Inc.said. Simply reselling SD-WAN is a race to the bottom, as enterprises will group together circuits from multiple providers and go with the one that offers the best price performance, a pattern Perrin tagged “MPLS arbitrage.” In that case, customers benefit by saving money, vendors benefit, but service providers lose out on revenue, Mr. Perrin said. Service providers can avoid this fate by combining SD-WAN into a suite of vCPE and other services (what might those be?).


Read more at:

http://www.lightreading.com/carrier-sdn/sdn-technology/centurylink-expect-sd-wan-surprises/d/d-id/726096

References from CenturyLink:

http://www.centurylink.com/business/enterprise/services/data-network/sd-wan.html

http://news.centurylink.com/news/centurylink-unveils-fully-managed-sd-wan-service

http://www.centurylink.com/asset/business/enterprise/data-sheet/sd-wan-sellsheet-ss160184.pdf

Related posts:

 

IHS Markit SD-WAN Webcast Presentation Slides:

http://event.llnw.on24.com/event/12/39/68/5/rt/1/documents/resourceList1473867211535/2016_ihs_markit_sdn_comm_deploy_bus_case.pdf

Author’s Note:

On this webcast, Telstra (Australia) was said to be the first carrier to deploy SDN in the WAN.  Windstream said that we are in an early “journey” to SDN WAN.  AT&Ts Network on Demand was cited as being a SDN WAN, but it’s actually only confined to the Management Plane for provisioning & reconfiguration which the Open Network Foundation (creators of Open Flow “southbound API”) doesn’t address let alone specify.

AT&T’s Network on Demand offers customer automated provisioning and rate changes for a switched Ethernet WAN.  I was told that it used NETCONF and YANG modeling language for configuration/provisioning, along with some form of network orchestration software (possibly from TAIL-f/Cisco).

Copy/paste from AT&T’s website referenced above:

AT&T Network on Demand is the first of its kind software-defined networking solution in the U.S. It makes network management easier than ever with an online self-service portal. Business customers can now easily add or change services, scale bandwidth to meet their changing needs and manage their network all in near real time. This translates into time savings and less complexity for companies of all sizes.

“We’re working with Cisco to bring the next-generation network technology benefits to our customers. Cisco is an industry leader in networking. Their extensive SDN and NFV capabilities will broaden and enhance our Network on Demand platform,” Ralph de la Vega, president and CEO, AT&T Mobile and Business Solutions.

We’re continuing to make our network dynamic and adaptive with these new Network on Demand capabilities. This will enable the agility, speed and efficiency customers need.


Bottom Line:  AT&T’s Network on Demand has nothing to do with the classical definition of SDN, i.e.  separation of Control and Data planes and concept of a centralized SDN controller responsible for all path selection (routes) within its domain.  Also, it doesn’t use OpenFlow for the software interface/”southbound API” between the Control and Data planes, which are not strictly separated in the Carrier Ethernet switches from Cisco, which are used throughout this switched Ethernet wide area network.

The key point of all this is that SDN WAN has lost its meaning.  Any network provider using any type of software controlled WAN mechanism now says they have a “SDN” WAN.

What Innovation Do Telecom Carriers Need Today?

This is a question the Telecom Council of Silicon Valley asks of global carriers every September – and they answer at the TC3 Summit.

The Council is a bridge between entrepreneurs and telecom giants.  It strives to understand the specific technology gaps of the network operators, so they can be clearly communicated to both start-ups and established vendors. Every year, a consolidated report is freely offered to entrepreneurs worldwide, which can help guide them towards possible deals with operators.

The Council reports that draft versions of the carriers’ innovation demands are starting to roll in for this year’s TC3 summit.  Many carriers are seeking solutions in the following areas:

  •          Virtualization, NFV and VNFs, including MANO (Management & Orchestration) solutions
  •          SDN and SON (Self Organizing Networks) solutions
  •          IoT platforms, narrowband solutions
  •          “5G-ready” technologies (in advance of standardized “5G”)
  •          Media integration. Ways of integrating winning content with the network
  •          Solutions for handling Video with aplomb
  •          Big Data and analytics
  •          Digital Transformations, from the core right to the Customer Experience
  •          Shifting focus away from wireless access to SDN
  •          Improving the digital customer experience

 

 

 

Unfortunately for Tier 1 vendors, this does not translate into more revenue, since one of the main goals of virtualization is reduction in the Capital Expenditure (CAPEX) on dedicated hardware solutions. But on the other hand, it does open up the market, allowing new entrants to compete in these newly opened technology gaps. This is good news for entrepreneurs, VCs, and startups.

Editor’s Note: The 9th Annual TC3 Summit in Silicon Valley will take place Sept 28-29, 2016 at the Computer History Museum in Mt. View, CA.  TC3 gathers innovation scouts from global telcos and communication vendors and will introduce over 50 innovation solutions to the telecom/ICT industry.

You can learn more about TC3 carrier road maps, innovations presented, sponsors and start-up vendor demo’s here.

To participate and attend TC3, use our IEEE ComSoc Community reader discount of $200 off: IEEE200 at the Registration web page.

Blog Posts on 2013 TC3 (last one this author attended):

http://viodi.com/2013/09/26/tc3-part-3-unifi-communications-an-interesting-global-voip-network-provider/

http://viodi.com/2013/09/25/tc3-part-2-likely-strategic-goals-for-next-fcc-chairman-obstacles-ahead/

http://viodi.com/2013/09/23/2013-telecom-council-tc3-part-1-start-up-pitches-and-spiffy-award-winners/

“Real” 5G Is Far in Future; Service Providers Struggling to Find Compelling Use Cases

By Stéphane Téral, senior research director, mobile infrastructure and carrier economics, IHS Markit

Bottom Line

  • 5G will come in two waves: first, sub-6GHz in 2017, followed by the “real” 5G at higher spectrum bands—millimeter wave (mmWave)—in 2020
  • Sub-6GHz spectrum is not new: it’s where existing mobile and wireless communications already coexist
  • Service providers in the 5G race are struggling to find compelling use cases that substantially benefit from the proposed International Telecommunication Union (ITU) IMT-2020 standard

 

Our Analysis

The 5G race is on and raging. The very first discussions about 5G started in 2012, and in 2013 NTT DoCoMo garnered attention by seriously discussing the possibility of rolling out 5G in time for the Tokyo Olympics in 2020.

Soon after, South Korea set the target for pre-commercial 5G showcasing commercial pre-standard evolutionary 5G—in reality, something like a 4.5G—for the PyeongChang Winter Olympics in 2018. Since then, major 5G R&D developments have happened in China, Europe, Japan and South Korea, fueling the hype to a level never seen for 3G and 4G. And finally, Verizon caught the mobile industry off guard last year at CTIA by announcing its aggressive 5G plan with first commercial deployments in 2017.

So What Is 5G, Anyway?

5G means a lot of different things to different people in various industries. Every stakeholder in the game—vendors, mobile operators, 5GPPP, the ITU and others—has its own ideas and thoughts about what 5G should be, and there’s currently a split between two schools of thought. Evolutionary 5G is an extension of current Long Term Evolution (LTE) and LTE-Advanced networks and is backward compatible with all 3GPP technologies. Revolutionary 5G, meanwhile, is a brand-new network architecture that requires a new air interface and radio access technology (RAT), moving away from current cellular designs.

In the end, 5G is the evolution of wireless and mobile technologies to create a new mode of connectivity that will not only provide humans with an enhanced broadband experience, but also address a wide range of industrial applications. What it is not is a continuing development of 4G and current technologies. 5G is already on a path that goes beyond cellular, shaping up as a multilink architecture that enables direct device-to-device communications.

4G is just ramping up, and LTE as we know it is just at 3G transitional. As such, 4G will continue to evolve in parallel with the ongoing development of 5G.

“Pre-5G”

Driven by the pre-5G race agenda spearheaded by Verizon, KT, SK Telecom, NTT DOCOMO, KDDI and Softbank, all radio access network (RAN) vendors are developing 5G air interfaces and new RAT ahead of the release of spectrum. But these early 5G systems will be “pre-5G” and operating in sub-6GHz spectrum. And let’s face it: there really isn’t anything new in sub-6GHz spectrum—it’s where existing mobile and wireless communications already coexist. Still, there is simply no choice, as mmWaves are far from being ready for prime time. So as a result, “real” 5G at higher spectrum bands isn’t expected until 2020.

Use Cases? What Use Cases?

The entire mobile ecosystem is trying to figure out the uses cases for 5G. Every service provider on this planet that has jumped into the 5G race is trying to find convincing uses cases that can greatly benefit from the proposed ITU IMT-2020 enhancements. And although the usual suspects are already in the game, companies such as Google and would-be entrepreneurs may come to the table with disruptive ideas.

Backing up the notion that industry will drive 5G, three-quarters of the global operators that participated in our recent5G Strategies Global Service Provider Survey rated the Internet of Things (IoT) as the top use case for 5G.

5G Report Synopsis

The 60-page IHS Markit 5G market report examines how 5G technology can evolve in terms of network architecture, topology, waveform and modulation schemes.

For information about purchasing this report, contact the sales department at IHS Markit in the Americas at (844) 301-7334 or [email protected]; in Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) at +44 1344 328 300 or[email protected]; or Asia-Pacific (APAC) at +604 291 3600 or [email protected].


IHS Reference:

https://technology.ihs.com/582964/research-note-the-5g-race-is-on-with-iot-as-the-top-use-case


The International Telecommunications Union (ITU) has outlined three use cases for what is expected to be the 5G standard, as well as applications and industries that could benefit from the new network. Those included, enhanced mobile broadband; ultra-reliable and low-latency communications; and massive machine-type communications.

ITU-R 5G References:

https://www.itu.int/net4/wsis/forum/2016/Content/AgendaFiles/document/9d6c7b67-33a7-4ac6-96c7-ebf2231d83c2/ITU-BR_Colin_Langtry.pdf

https://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu-r/rec/m/R-REC-M.2083-0-201509-I!!PDF-E.pdf


IHS Markit: 75% of Carriers Surveyed Have Deployed or Will Deploy SDN This Year

By Michael Howard, senior research director carrier networks, IHS Markit

Bottom Line

  • Three-quarters of carriers participating in the IHS Markit software-defined networking (SDN) survey say they have already deployed or will deploy SDN in 2016; 100 percent plan to deploy the technology at some point
  • The top drivers for service provider SDN investments and deployments are simplification and automation of network and service provisioning, as well as service automation
  • Most operators are moving from SDN proof-of-concept (PoC) evaluations to commercial deployments in 2016 and 2017

 

IHS Analysis

In our fourth annual survey of carrier SDN strategies, it’s clear that service providers around the globe are investing in SDN as part of a larger move to automate their networks and transform not only their networks, but also internal processes, operations and service offerings.

Service providers believe that SDN will fundamentally change telecom network architecture and deliver benefits in service agility, time to revenue, operational efficiency and capex savings.

And these operators want SDN in most parts of their networks. Survey respondents’ top three SDN-targeted network domains for deployment by the end of 2017 are within data centers, between data centers and access for businesses.

Still, carriers are starting carefully with SDN, biting off small chunks of their networks called “contained domains” in which they will explore, trial, test and make initial deployments. Momentum is strong, but it will be many years before bigger parts of networks or entire networks are controlled by SDN—although a few operators are leading the way including AT&T, Level 3, Colt, Orange Business Systems, SK Telecom and Telefónica, among others.

The industry is still in the early stages of a long-term transition to SDN and network functions virtualization (NFV) architected networks. Much continues to be learned as each year passes, and various barriers and drivers have become more prominent as operators inch closer to commercial deployment. In this year’s survey, for example, respondent operators indicated that their top barriers to deployment are the lack of carrier-grade products and integration of virtual networking into their existing physical networks. Nonetheless, they rated virtual customer premises equipment (vCPE) managed services as the top SDN/NFV application for producing new sources of revenue.

Carriers are learning that some avenues are not as fruitful as expected, and telecom equipment manufacturers and software suppliers may well invent new approaches that open up new applications. IHS Markit will conduct the fifth annual SDN survey in 2017, and it will be interesting to see what new issues emerge and which problems get resolved in the additional commercial deployments planned for 2016.

SDN Survey Synopsis

The 22-page IHS Markit SDN strategies survey is based on interviews with purchase-decision makers at 28 service providers around the world that control 53 percent of world’s telecom capex and are deploying or plan to deploy SDN in their networks in the future. Operators were asked about their strategies and timing for SDN, including deployment drivers and barriers, target use cases, applications and more.

How to Buy this Report

For information about purchasing this report, contact the sales department at IHS Markit in the Americas at (844) 301-7334 or [email protected]; in Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) at +44 1344 328 300 or [email protected]; or Asia-Pacific (APAC) at +604 291 3600 or [email protected].


Previous IHS SDN Forecast Chart:

Author’s Opinion:

While there may be pockets of SDN deployed in carrier networks this year and next, we maintain it won’t present a large business opportunity for any carrier vendor/suppliers.  That’s because each network (and cloud service) provider has their own version of SDN, with none compatible with any others!  That in turn is due to the fragmentation of the market due to too many versions of SDN and no solid standards for multi-vendor interoperability.

We think the CORD project and mobile CORD have a much better opportunity because vendors are collaborating under various open source consortiums to disaggregate hardware of network elements, specify functional groupings and inter-module communications.  IMHO, the dis-aggregation/network equipment virtualization trend is irreversible.

Here are a few references:

CORD: REINVENTING CENTRAL OFFICES FOR EFFICIENCY & AGILITY

Threat of Disaggregated Network Equipment – Part 3

CORD (Central Office Re-architected as a Datacenter): the killer app for SDN & NFV

Highlights of Light Reading’s White Box Strategies for Communications Service Providers (CSPs)

Page 266 of 319
1 264 265 266 267 268 319