Analysis: Fiber Broadband Association (FBA) whitepaper: Upgrading MSO Networks to Fiber to the Home (FTTH): A Technical Perspective
Executive Summary:
The Fiber Broadband Association (FBA) has published an economic and structural framework for Hybrid Fiber Coax (HFC)-to-Fiber to the Premises (FTTP) [1.] upgrades, viewing that as a ‘strategic imperative’ for cable network operators (MSOs). FBA’s The whitepaper white paper, “Upgrading MSO Networks to Fiber to the Home (FTTH): A Technical Perspective,“ positions fiber as the long-term architectural solution for cable access networks.
The whitepaper evaluates multiple migration paths—including full overbuilds, targeted deployments, and HFC/FTTP coexistence—alongside passive optical network (PON) options and operating models. Economically, the report estimates FTTP operating expenses to be approximately 50% lower than HFC, driven by the elimination of active outside plant components. It outlines deployment options ranging from incremental overlays to full HFC replacement, each with distinct cost-performance trade-offs.
Note 1. Fiber optic access networks (sometimes referred to as fiber-to-the-home—FTTH—or fiber-to-the-premises—FTTP) are built to connect homes and businesses to lightning fast Internet connections. The fiber optic cables that make up these networks are the fastest and most reliable broadband technology and are capable of delivering vastly higher bandwidth than traditional copper wires or wireless. All-fiber networks are directly connected from the central office all the way to a subscriber’s building. There is no other technology along the path except fiber optics.
Fiber optic cables are made up of thin strands of glass that carry information by transmitting pulses of light, which are usually created by lasers. The vibrations are turned on and off very quickly. A single fiber can carry multiple streams of information simultaneously over different wavelengths, or colors, of light, enabling more robust video, Internet, and voice services. Fiber cables are capable of transmitting multi-gigabit Internet speeds compared to the mere megabytes typical of copper connections.
Image Credit: Panther Media GmbH/Alamy Stock Photo
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Divergent Cable Operator (MSO) Strategies:
In practice, MSO upgrade strategies remain highly variable, shaped by market competition, plant condition, density, and capital constraints. Most large operators now manage hybrid access portfolios spanning HFC, FTTP, and, in some cases, fixed wireless access (FWA).
Optimum Communications, for example, is deploying FTTP overlays in dense Northeastern markets while relying on DOCSIS 3.1 in rural areas where fiber economics are less favorable.
Comcast and Charter similarly pursue selective FTTP in greenfield and edge-out scenarios but continue to prioritize HFC evolution via DOCSIS 4.0. Both assert that upgraded HFC can deliver symmetrical multi-gigabit services at lower cost. Charter estimates upgrade costs at approximately $100 per home passed (excluding CPE), versus roughly $200 for Comcast. Both operators utilize virtualized CMTS platforms and distributed access architectures (DAA) to support converged HFC/FTTP operations and targeted fiber extensions.
Operational cost differences remain contested. Charter CEO Chris Winfrey characterized the delta as minimal—on the order of one to two dollars per passing—stating, “We’ll take that tradeoff any day.” This reinforces the view that large-scale HFC-to-FTTP overbuilds are unlikely among major incumbents in the near term.
HFC investment also continues. Comcast and Charter are deploying low-latency capabilities based on the IETF Low Latency Low Loss Scalable Throughput (L4S) standard, with Charter already launching in multiple U.S. markets.
Fiber-First Deployments:
Smaller operators are, in some cases, moving more decisively toward FTTP. MCTV, serving approximately 57,000 customers in Ohio and West Virginia, determined that FTTP and DOCSIS 3.1 were cost-comparable and opted for full fiber rebuilds. The operator now passes more than 80% of its footprint with FTTP and has decommissioned roughly two-thirds of its HFC power supplies.
Competitive and Technology Outlook:
The FBA identifies FTTP as the “primary driver” of recent cable subscriber losses, citing “structural limitations” of HFC in symmetry, latency, and scalability “that DOCSIS upgrades can partially address but not fully overcome.” Cable proponents dispute this, pointing to DOCSIS 4.0 and future enhancements.
However, competitive pressure is multi-dimensional. In addition to fiber, FWA is gaining traction, particularly in lower-speed tiers. As a result, operators are increasingly focused on pricing, service bundling, and customer experience, including converged broadband-mobile offerings, rather than peak speeds alone.
On the technology roadmap, CableLabs continues to extend DOCSIS, including exploration of an “operational annex” supporting spectrum up to 3 GHz and downstream rates around 25 Gbit/s, with longer-term targets of 6 GHz and 50 Gbit/s. At the same time, it is expanding work on PON, including coherent PON, reflecting a more access-technology-agnostic posture.
Migration Trajectory:
Some industry veterans align with the FBA’s long-term view. John Chapman has advocated a “fiber-first” strategy, citing projections that access networks may need to support up to 1 Tbit/s by 2040. Rather than abrupt transitions, this approach emphasizes phased migration from HFC to FTTP while leveraging existing infrastructure.
Quotes:
John Chapman, a DOCSIS pioneer and former long-time Cisco Systems engineering exec, suggested last year that the cable industry should adjust its thinking and take a “fiber-first” approach as historical trends indicate that broadband access networks will need to be capable of supporting speeds of 1 Tbit/s by 2040. Rather than doing a quick cutover, he thinks MSO’s should migrate from HFC to FTTP over an extended period. But they should get started now.
“The industry has reached an inflection point between the maturity of DOCSIS and the inevitability of fiber. It’s about coming up with a graceful, pragmatic solution to migrate, to transition from DOCSIS to fiber. And that migration’s going to take 20 years. But we need a strategy that accommodates the two,” he said. “It’s a cultural change.”
Jay Rolls, a former Charter CTO and current CTO of BSP, a company that conducts due diligence on various types of broadband network transactions, also believes that cable operators should be weighing whether FTTP is the right move. His recent analysis suggests that the capital spend on a DOCSIS 4.0 overhaul is comparable to an FTTP rebuild.
“Every network and market is different, but the tipping point is fast arriving where overbuilding fiber makes as much financial sense as upgrading HFC, especially when you consider what comes next,” he said on a Light Reading podcast.
References:
Upgrading MSO Networks to Fiber to the Home (FTTH): A Technical Perspective
https://fiberconnect.fiberbroadband.org/
